Monday, December 3, 2012






Anthony Reaves Sr.

Discussion #2 Edition

     I think most of Instruction Designs trends have been influenced by Behavioral and Cognitive

Based Paradigms. Theorist such as Gagne, (Acquisition Knowledge and Hierarchal Sequencing),

and Ausubel, (Theory of Progressive Differentation). Although now the trend seems to be more

Cognitive than Behavioral. The shift seems to be leaning more to stimulus response

reinforcement or the mental processes of the learner. I guess I have been a fan of this as one

who has a strong interest in the Social Sciences. So if I tend to lean more on this type of

research I ask for your forgiveness in advance. I believe that also that Constructivism, (or active,

self- regulated, goal directed and reflective), learner constructs encouraged discovery and

exploration that respond to interactive media learning and has also been a force that expanded

E-Learning. Instructional theories are constantly being synthesized into this movement. New

Instructional settings are being produced at a record pace, new strategies, combinations and

sequences are producing more Instructional Design Flexibility.

      The more structured Mastery or teacher centered approach, with its structured sub goals

leading to efficient performance seems to be becoming extinct.  I cannot say I am totally happy

about this, because it is still my personal belief that teaching is teaching and theoretically

structure is important in terms of basics. However I do acknowledge and affirm that the self-

regulated approach, (where student centered learning has produced undeniable success with a

greater rate to students graduating and older students like many of us here being retrained or

updating their skills). Elaboration Theory is allowing us to transition from Learning Theory to

 

Discussion #2 Edition Reaves

Instructional Design. The reason for this is because it is primarily interested in helping us or

telling us how to teach rather than focusing on how or why people learn, (admittedly this was

hard for me a diehard Social Worker, lol). Elaboration Theory basically goes from general to

specific and uses Sequencing and each part of the sequencing has to be related to the general

context and to other parts of the sequencing  which is basically Synthesizing. These parts are

constantly divided and subdivided until the desired results are achieved. This facilitates

integration of new material with existing knowledge fairly quickly especially in the context of E-

learning. Where material can be assumed as quickly or as slowly as needed, or obtaining more

accurate assessment methods that require less time assimilating. Tennyson’s Linking

Theory also helped in this transition by linking educational theory to educational goals, learning

objectives and instructional thought. It basically linked academic learning time with learning

objectives and self- regulated philosophical approaches to learning, (Very compatible with E-

Learning), because it improves the employment of knowledge. The Felder-Silverman Model

emphasizes a student’s learning style or what a student prefers to perceive. It features Sensory

(or sights sounds and physical sensations), Intuitive,(or insights, memories, thoughts).

According to Felder and Silverman), Intuitive learners are more comfortable with abstractions,

(Theories and mathematical models)and sensory learners are more comfortable with concrete,

practical, methodical, facts and hands on procedures.

 

                                                                 References

Ausubel, D.P. (1969), A Cognitive Theory of School Learning: Psychology In the Schools 6, Pp.

331- 335.

Brown, J.S., Collins, A, & Duguid, P. Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning

     1989 Educated Researcher, 18, Pp. 32-42

Gagne, R.M. and Briggs, L.J. Principles of Instructional Design, (1979) Principles of Instructional

     Design, (2nd edition), New York, NY. Holt, Rinehart & Winston Publishers.

National center on Accessing the General Curriculum, (NCAC): Effective Classroom Practices

     Report; Differentiated Instruction and Implications for UDL Implementation, retrieved

     November 2, 2012. January 2005 Journal of Engineering Education.


Tennyson, R.D. & Elmore, R.L. : Learning Theory Foundations for Instructional Design;

      International Perspectives, Vol. 1: Theory and Research, (Pp. 55-78), Mahwah, N.J.
     






http://portal.sliderocket.com/AWRDP/My-Presentation-4






https://dropbox.next.ecollege.com/(NEXT(fda67bf5a6))/Main/CourseMode/GradebookDetail/DownloadAttachment.ed?attachmentid=2000014342417

No comments:

Post a Comment